Examples:
The relation of the tags to the words or larger chunks may either be expressed by repeating the transcript in the tagging or by giving pointers (usually word numbers) to the transcript. The latter method has the advantage that typos or other errors in the transcript may be pruned without affecting the tagging given that the order of words in the transcript remains the same.
For example in the BAS Partitur Format (BPF)8.10 the transcript and dialog act labeling of a dialog turn could be represented as follows:
ORT: 0 good ORT: 1 morning ORT: 2 have ORT: 3 we ORT: 4 met ORT: 5 before DIA: 0,1 GREETING_AB DIA: 2,3,4,5 QUERY_ABAs you can see the transcript assigns a unique number to every word which than may be used in different tagging (and segmentations) as a pointer to words.
Taggings are produced manually or automatically. In case of manual tagging
the same measures have to be taken as in the case of complex transcripts
to ensure consistent and reproducible results (see section
).