Publications
This is a searchable list of publications of scientists working at or associated with the Institute of Phonetics and Speech Processing. You can choose to sort the list by year or by publication type.
The complete list in BibTeX format can be downloaded here:
Download list of publications (bibtex)
The “Research Reports of the Institute of Phonetics and Speech Communications” (FIPKM, “Forschungseberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation“) were edited and published for 39 volumes until the series was discontinued in 2002. Some of the volumes published between 1996 and 2002 are available online. Others are available in print at request.
More information
Search
Reference
Brunelle, M., Thành Tấn, T., Kirby, J., Lư Giang, \. (2019). Obstruent Devoicing and Registrogenesis in Chru. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 517-521).
BibTeX
@inproceedings{brunelleObstruentDevoicingRegistrogenesis2019, title = {Obstruent Devoicing and Registrogenesis in {{Chru}}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {{Nineteenth International Congress}} of {{Phonetic Sciences}}}, author = {Brunelle, Marc and Th{\`a}nh Tấn, T{\d a} and Kirby, James and Lư Giang, {\DJ}inh}, year = {2019}, pages = {517--521}, address = {Melbourne}, abstract = {We describe the register system of Chru, a Chamic language of Vietnam. In Chru, a historical contrast between prevoiced and voiceless stops is now a system of two registers signalled by differences in f0, voice quality, and F1 in addition to closure voicing. However, closure voicing is in a state of flux: while older men maintain closure voicing in the onsets of low-register items, younger speakers and some older women frequently have no (or only weak) closure voicing in this context. In addition, the distribution of VOT in low register onsets is bimodal, realized either with strong closure voicing or greater VOT than voiceless stops. Interestingly, f0, F1 and voice quality cues are not enhanced after devoiced low-register stops, but instead are more pronounced after stops realized with closure voicing. We argue this indicates that enhancement of cues in phonologization must in some sense be complete before neutralization takes place.} }
Powered by bibtexbrowser