Phonetik und Sprachverarbeitung
print

Links und Funktionen
Sprachumschaltung

Navigationspfad


Inhaltsbereich

Publications

This is a searchable list of publications of scientists working at or associated with the Institute of Phonetics and Speech Processing. You can choose to sort the list by year or by publication type.

The complete list in BibTeX format can be downloaded here:
Download list of publications (bibtex)

The “Research Reports of the Institute of Phonetics and Speech Communications” (FIPKM, “Forschungseberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation“) were edited and published for 39 volumes until the series was discontinued in 2002. Some of the volumes published between 1996 and 2002 are available online. Others are available in print at request.
More information


Search


Regular expression, case-insensitive, matched against all BibTeX fields (author, title, etc.)


One or more years or ranges of years, e. g.
1993
1995-1998
08-
-99,02-06,14-





Reference

Brunelle, M., Thành Tấn, T., Kirby, J., Lư Giang, \. (2019). Obstruent Devoicing and Registrogenesis in Chru. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 517-521).

BibTeX

@inproceedings{brunelleObstruentDevoicingRegistrogenesis2019,
  title = {Obstruent Devoicing and Registrogenesis in {{Chru}}},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the {{Nineteenth International Congress}} of {{Phonetic Sciences}}},
  author = {Brunelle, Marc and Th{\`a}nh Tấn, T{\d a} and Kirby, James and Lư Giang, {\DJ}inh},
  year = {2019},
  pages = {517--521},
  address = {Melbourne},
  abstract = {We describe the register system of Chru, a Chamic  language of Vietnam. In Chru, a historical contrast  between prevoiced and voiceless stops is now a  system of two registers signalled by differences in f0,  voice quality, and F1 in addition to closure voicing.  However, closure voicing is in a state of flux: while  older men maintain closure voicing in the onsets of  low-register items, younger speakers and some older  women frequently have no (or only weak) closure  voicing in this context. In addition, the distribution of  VOT in low register onsets is bimodal, realized either  with strong closure voicing or greater VOT than  voiceless stops. Interestingly, f0, F1 and voice quality  cues are not enhanced after devoiced low-register stops, but instead are more pronounced after stops  realized with closure voicing. We argue this indicates  that enhancement of cues in phonologization must in  some sense be complete before neutralization takes  place.}
}

Powered by bibtexbrowser