Phonetik und Sprachverarbeitung
print

Links und Funktionen
Sprachumschaltung

Navigationspfad


Inhaltsbereich

Publications

This is a searchable list of publications of scientists working at or associated with the Institute of Phonetics and Speech Processing. You can choose to sort the list by year or by publication type.

The complete list in BibTeX format can be downloaded here:
Download list of publications (bibtex)

The “Research Reports of the Institute of Phonetics and Speech Communications” (FIPKM, “Forschungseberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation“) were edited and published for 39 volumes until the series was discontinued in 2002. Some of the volumes published between 1996 and 2002 are available online. Others are available in print at request.
More information


Search


Regular expression, case-insensitive, matched against all BibTeX fields (author, title, etc.)


One or more years or ranges of years, e. g.
1993
1995-1998
08-
-99,02-06,14-





Reference

Gao, J., Kirby, J. (2023). Perceptual Adaptation to Altered Cue Informativeness: Distributional, Auditory, and Lexical Factors. In Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 137-141).

BibTeX

@inproceedings{gaoPerceptualAdaptationAltered2023,
  title = {Perceptual Adaptation to Altered Cue Informativeness: Distributional, Auditory, and Lexical Factors},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 20th {{International Congress}} of {{Phonetic Sciences}}},
  author = {Gao, Jiayin and Kirby, James},
  year = {2023},
  pages = {137--141},
  address = {Prague},
  abstract = {This study examines French-speaking listeners' perceptual adaptation to altered informativeness of acoustic cues signalling the voicing contrast. We attempt to condition a shift of perceptual attention from a primary cue to a secondary cue. Listeners were exposed to stimuli in which the distributional characteristics of either the primary or secondary cue were altered: either informativeness of F0 was increased, or that of VOT was decreased. When lexical feedback was given, increased informativeness of F0 led to listeners' increased use of high F0 in identifying voiceless plosives, whereas decreased informativeness of VOT led to increased use of low F0 in identifying voiced plosives. We suggest this asymmetry is due to general auditory mechanisms in the perception of F0 and VOT. Our findings highlight the importance of non-distributional characteristics such as auditory mechanisms and lexical knowledge in cue (re-)weighting, shedding light on how a secondary cue is phonologised in sound change.},
  copyright = {All rights reserved},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/Users/felicitas/Zotero/storage/7LAAWAXL/gao2023perceptual.pdf}
}

Powered by bibtexbrowser